Spam Filtering not as good as it might


#1

Over the years I’ve had very good results with Spam Assassin, but the server-wide version here on DreamHost isn’t as sharp as I’d like. Part of this is that I don’t get to tweak the rules, and that it doesn’t do Bayesian filtering. But the following email really puzzled me:

[quote]X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=-999.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level:

The Only Clinically Tested Penis En_Largement Products!

  • Guuaarantee 1+ inches in 2 months (or moneeyy back)
  • Experience Longer Lasting and More Enjoying Seexx
  • Easy to Wear With No Additional Exercises Require
  • The More You Wear, the Longer It Will Be
  • Millions of People are Enjoying the Benefit of It

Check Uss Out Tooday!

http://genuinely.net/extender/?ronn

o-ut of mai-lling lisst:
http://genuinely.net/rm.php?ronn

4JR[/quote]
That should have hit a number of Spam Assassin rules as best I understand. Also note that the Spam Assassin version is missing.


Kevin