I was a little surprised by the potential for downtime, and now by the actual downtime.
Is DreamObjects not meant to be used, in part, for static website content as well as object storage like uploaded user data via a website? If one used DreamObjects in such a way, during this maintenance window their site would be broken.
Maybe I’m missing the appropriate use of DreamObjects, as I know CDNs are often put in front of things like this, but even in that case new content couldn’t be uploaded.
Luckily I don’t use DreamObjects for anything that I need available all the time, but just the fact that I’m saying this I feel is damning for the usefulness of the service. Am I wrong here?