Hmmm. I apologize. I keep forgetting how sensitive you are to your posting history here, and how much you don't appreciate having it referenced.
What was meant to be "useful" was pointing out, to moua, in response to moua's question, that the original question was a "troll", (offering item "B" in light of Item "A", though the two are completely unrelated). You don't find that "useful", others might.
I did not, nor will I, respond to your original post, or any further post from you in this thread. So have at it!
At any rate, I've been this route before ... I've said my piece, you've objected, I've apologized; we still disagree.. Rock on!